Share to Facebook

Saturday, September 29, 2018

Investigative Report


The Politics of the Bidwell Forest, Part I
or 
It's for the Kids! 

Copyright 2018 by David W. Runyan II 

Other Investigative Reports by David W. Runyan II 



Introduction


***UPDATE 6/20/23*** The town's attempt to get a highway ramp on South Athol Road has failed so they have abandoned their industrial park dreams for the Bidwell Forest and are turning their attention to making it a housing subdivision, which still violates what we were told, "land bank for future municipal usage" . . . private homes don't constitute municipal usage.

In June, 2009, the Town of Athol bought the 100-acre Bidwell Forest.

When I returned to town later that year virtually everyone was telling me the same story: that the Bidwell Forest was the site of a new school. I contacted town officials to inquire and was told it was a land bank for any future municipal project and not for schools exclusively. The response from town hall was in stark contrast to the unanimous local chatter.

I was curious. Where did the people get this idea? So I set out to discover the truth of the matter through investigative research.

Along the way, as often happens in investigative work, spurious curiosities arose, causing the scope of the report to expand. So many curiosities in fact that I decided to split the report into three parts to provide a sharper focus on each of the important elements.

And now, what I've learned about the politics of the Bidwell Forest.


The Politics of the Bidwell Forest, Part I

Getting Acquainted 

If you live in Athol you're most likely familiar with this imposing white barn on South Athol Road at the intersection of Partridgeville Road. The barn and the 100 acres of forest behind it were the property of Dewey Bidwell until 2009 when the Town of Athol purchased the land from the estate of Mr. Bidwell.

from the photo archives of david w runyan II

The Bidwell Forest has some wonderful features. It's public property. You're free to explore it. Parking is available to the right side of the barn.

So before we step into the report, let's step into the forest.

Directly behind the barn is a nicely preserved stretch of the historic Rabbit Run rail bed. For those of you who might be unfamiliar, the Rabbit Run was a commuter rail connecting Athol and Springfield which was forced out of business by creation of Quabbin Reservoir.

The Bidwell stretch of the Rabbit Run is a charming grassy path, lined with ferns and over-arching trees. It's a pretty place to walk in all seasons.


from the photo archives of david w runyan II

Behind the rail bed are 100 acres of hills, trails, erratics and streams. Among the wildflowers present are the rare Trailing Arbutus, Wild Azalea and Mountain Laurel. Most of the trails are easy to moderate grades and a few are more challenging. I encourage my fellow Atholians to explore and enjoy this intriguing forest.



Addressing the Main Question

Did town officials lead people to believe that the Bidwell Forest was needed for a new school?

To answer this question I searched through Athol Daily News archives for the period 4/1/09 - 6/9/09 and watched the AOTV video of the special town meeting on June 8, 2009 pertaining to the debate and vote on the purchase of the Bidwell Forest.


I also requested the minutes of the Athol BOS meetings for the period 3/09 - 6/09 but was told that they can't be found. It is to be noted that there was no trouble finding the BOS minutes prior to and following this time period.

Here then is the body of available evidence.

Athol Daily News, April1, 2009, Page 1: The words of then town manager, David Ames as presented by reporter, Brian Gelinas: "Ames said the town would be purchasing the property for land banking purposes for future open space or other use, such as the location for a new elementary or high school facility or both. He added the property would also have economic development value, if new school facilities were located elsewhere.”

Athol Daily News, May 20, 2009, Page 1: The words of then town manager, David Ames as presented by reporter, Brian Gelinas: “The potential future use is up to the town's voters, said Town Manager David Ames recently. However, he noted the property is large enough for two schools or ball fields, and could also be used in other ways.”

Athol Daily News, June 9, 2009, Page 1: The words of reporter Brian Gelinas in his summary of the special town meeting approving the purchase of the Bidwell Forest: “Once purchased, the property, located to the east of South Athol Road at Partridgeville Road, will be land banked for future use by the town. Possible uses include, among others, being the site of a new high school or elementary school complex, the location of a new fire station, the site of new community ball fields, or a combination of uses.”



Notes from the AOTV video of the special town meeting, June 8, 2009, pertaining to purchase of the Bidwell Forest.

The first citizen to speak asked what kinds of uses are proposed for the land, to which town manager, David Ames replied by listing open space, fire station, schools, ball fields, and he referred to the parcel as a municipal land bank.

Toward the end of the debate, one of the selectman presented commentary in support of the purchase as follows: “The choice is pretty clear. We are going to hopefully look forward to the future and land bank this parcel of land so that the children of Athol” . . . he awkwardly truncated his comment, paused and then went on to explain how the little league has been searching for land for 25 years, how the land can be used for schools, or as he put it “any number of things”.


Did town officials lead people to believe that the Bidwell Forest was needed for a new school?

Yes, they did; repeatedly so. But they never stated that schools were the only possible use for the parcel. Each official comment begins with schools and ball fields and concludes with some figurative fine print disclaimer about “other uses”.

It's easy to understand how the people of Athol got this notion that the Bidwell Forest would be the site of a new school. They heard "It's For the Kids!" and ignored the fine print.

Why is this important?  Because now the town plans to industrialize the Bidwell Forest. There's no more talk about schools, ball fields, fire stations and recreation. All of the reasons presented to residents as justification for buying this land have magically vanished into thin air. Town officials are pulling a bait & switch on the people of Athol; the details of which are revealed in Bidwell Part II.



The Grand Plan

But that's not where this story ends.

Town officials told us that the Bidwell Forest was needed as a possible home for our new elementary school which was coming soon and for our new high school which will be coming in the future. 

Oh really?

In my research I discovered that the parcels of land on which the new elementary school was eventually built were purchased by the town in 1999, a full decade before the Bidwell purchase. If they bought the land for the new elementary school in 1999, why were they telling the people in 2009 that the Bidwell Forest was needed for the new elementary school? Isn't that a disturbing surprise.


from AxisGIS for the Town of Athol

Lots 87, 88 and 248 (outlined in blue) were all purchased in 1999 and are the location of the new central elementary school complex.

from AxisGIS for the Town of Athol


In addition to the parcels mentioned above, and 8 years prior to the Bidwell Purchase the town took 150 acres by eminent domain, linked it to a 60 acre parcel already owned by the town and leased the entire 210 acres to a small group of horse enthusiasts. This land was 3/4 miles from the elementary and middle schools and would have made a fine location for a new high school.



from AxisGIS for the Town of Athol


Based upon its vast land holdings which predated the Bidwell purchase by a decade, it appears that the town deliberately misled the people by suggesting that the Bidwell Forest was needed for schools.

But the equestrian park turns out to be quite the suspicious and curious land deal in and of itself so let's consider it for a moment.

The town took Lot 18 by eminent domain and paid $93,000.00 for 150 acres. Compare that to the $550,000.00 they paid for only 100 acres at the Bidwell Forest. 


Eminent domain is a serious matter. It's an infringement upon private property rights and to be used only as a last resort for critical needs of general welfare (roads, schools, reservoirs and so forth) Creating a horse park for a small special interest group does not seem to fit that criteria, but according to the legal documents, the town of Athol found it a matter of necessity to take land to create a members-only equestrian park.





Since the town already had 1,000 acres of land and trails in Bearsden Conservation Area which are open to horseback riding why was it necessary to create a horse park for this small special interest group?

Another thing to consider is that if the town was willing to exercise eminent domain for a horse park, why did they not do the same for the Bidwell Forest instead of paying twice the appraised value? Are horses more important than children?

If the town truly needed a landbank for schools, why were these 210 acres not banked for future educational needs?

Schools and ball fields (the stated purpose of the Bidwell purchase) would benefit all 11,000 residents whereas the horse park benefits only a few horse enthusiasts.

The horse park website explains their good fortune at acquiring this land.


(of interest: rumor has it that the residents of Pleasant Street, New Sherborn Road and Doe Valley Road did not want a certain type of low-income housing development on that parcel so town hall rode to their rescue using public money to take the land by eminent domain frivolously)


Various Suspicious Issues

In addition to the lies and deceptions about the Bidwell Forest being needed for the new elementary school, parsing the available evidence revealed a number of other seemingly unethical and possibly corrupt political actions related to this land deal.

The town paid $550,000.00 for the Bidwell Forest which was appraised at only $300,000.00 This should have instantly raised the eyebrows of every citizen and been immediately reported to the Massachusetts Office of Inspector General.



source: worcester county registry of deeds

At the start of the town meeting, ConCom Chair, Bob Muzzy stated that a developer made an offer and intended to strip mine the land for sand and gravel and afterwards put in a housing development; an assertion which echoes the Athol Daily News, April 1, 2009, page 1: “The property has a Chapter 61a agricultural certification which allows the town the right of first refusal when any offer is made. David Ames said a $550,000 offer has been made to the current owners by a developer who would purchase the property for the removal of gravel and the development of house lots”.

Be reminded that this is 2009 when the entire country is in the grips of the Great Recession; the real estate market has come to a screeching halt, homes are being foreclosed upon in massive numbers, new home construction has collapsed, home lenders are going bankrupt and home values are plummeting. And we are being asked to believe that an unnamed developer made a bonafide offer at twice the appraised value for the purpose of building homes.

But the plot thickens. Only a month later, as reported in the Athol Daily News, May 20, 2009, page 1, we are told that “ . . . the other interested party has since withdrawn its offer.”

We are told that an unnamed developer made a suspiciously high offer and then withdrew that offer despite the fact that the town's purchase would be delayed by several months as it was contingent upon sale of the old middle school. This has all the odors of a staged offer.

Under Chapter 61a, the town must be notified in writing of any offers on the land. The town is then required to verify that the offer is credible (bonafide). These requirements are in the law to prevent staged offers. There was no evidence in the ADN reports or at the town meeting to indicate that the offer was scrutinized.


 I requested the BOS minutes for the 3-month period leading up to the purchase and I also requested a copy of the offer, but town hall was unable or unwilling to produce them.

Even more curious than the offer being withdrawn is that after it was withdrawn, town officials did not make a reduced offer in line with the appraised value but instead matched the ridiculously high price of the now withdrawn offer and they did so in a suspicious manner. They canceled the right of first refusal and issued an RFP for land at $550,000; the exact amount of the now-withdrawn offer.


A certain comment made by David Ames caught my attention. One of the citizens asked if the land was suitable for a school and Mr. Ames replied by saying that there would need to be studies for whatever use is desired. I found this odd. Why would town officials spend a half million dollars, telling people that the land could be used for schools without first engaging in due diligence to determine that it was suitable for schools?

Another curious fact to ponder is the speed with which all of this occurred. The first public mention I could find of the matter was April 1, 2009 in the Athol Daily news and only 2 months later on June 8 it was a done deal. It seems that town officials spent $550,000.00 with little or no public discussion ahead of the vote. This was a lightning fast transaction. The intelligent people of town were never given a chance to ask hard questions and force town officials to qualify their proposed purchase.

There was no need for a lightning fast transaction. The offer had been withdrawn. Consider also that here we are 9 years after the purchase and nothing has been done with the property so the hasty action is highly suspicious.

One of the scare tactics used at the town meeting was the threat of losing our 61a right of first refusal.

A certain citizen smartly asked that since the Bidwell Forest was under Chapter 61A , why was it necessary to act immediately?

In his response to her question town manager, David Ames stated that if the land remains in 61a then the town has first right of refusal but if it comes out of 61a the town loses first right of refusal. He went on to say that there are ways around 61a and the town could lose this opportunity forever.

He created a false sense of urgency. There is no way around 61a right of first refusal. The BOS must vote upon that at the time the property comes out. And since the offer was withdrawn, there was no right of first refusal left to vote upon.

The most childish scare tactic used at the town meeting to get people on board with the Bidwell purchase was the suggestion that if we don't buy the Bidwell property right away we might end up throwing people out of their homes by eminent domain when we need land for schools in the future.

So, let's examine the merits of that threat.

Assuming that no suitable land is available for sale at the time we need to build a new high school, would it be necessary to evict families from their homes in order to build that school?

No, it would not be necessary.


This scare tactic was utter nonsense. In addition to the parcel mentioned above and thousands of other undeveloped acres around town, Athol is replete with exhausted sand and gravel strip mines which are essentially graded and school-ready. Between them, Lyman Construction, Graves Construction and Sykes Construction own over 2,000 acres of land in town such as the 75-acre Graves site shown in the photo below. The suggestion that the town is out of land for schools and might have to take homes by eminent domain is a claim which is beyond absurd. It's an outright fabrication. Town officials are telling tall tales and the Bidwell Forest was never needed as a land bank for schools.

from the photo archives of david w runyan II

As you can see, parsing the available evidence created an unending well of suspicions regarding the actions and motives of town officials.  But enough is enough.


Concluding Matters

I began this report with the objective of discovering whether or not town officials led the people of Athol to believe that the Bidwell Forest would be used for new schools. And it seems that they indeed created that perception but cleverly covered their bases by including vague references to “other uses”.

The fact that town officials specifically mentioned the new elementary school as a possibility for the Bidwell Forest when the land for that school had been purchased 10 years earlier is a disconcerting twist to the plot.

The fact that town officials leased 210 acres which it already owned to a small group of horse enthusiasts rather than banking the land for future educational needs is likewise a disconcerting action.

As we shall discover in Part II, the town no longer mentions schools when it releases communiques on the Bidwell Forest. They have other things in mind and this suggests that schools were never really the reason for their interest in that land and a bait & switch is in play.

One thing is clear. The people of Athol were told that the Bidwell Forest was a municipal land bank to be used for schools, ball fields, open spaces, a fire station and in small print, “other uses”. Town officials might be wise to reserve it for schools, ball fields, open spaces or a fire station and forget about those "other uses".

And remember what town manager David Ames told us in the Athol Daily News on May 20, 2009: 
“The potential future use is up to the town's voters” 

Sounds like a promise to me. Let's hold our town officials to that promise.


Proceed to Bidwell Part II


Other Investigative Reports by David W. Runyan II

Monday, September 17, 2018

Investigative Report 


Route 2 Ramp at South Athol Road 

Copyright 2018 by David W. Runyan II 

Other Reports by David W. Runyan II


Introduction 


***UPDATE 6/20/23*** The ramp has failed to obtain funding, Southie is safe . . . for now.

The Town of Athol has recently petitioned the state to add a ramp connecting South Athol Road to highway Route 2. This is nothing new. Town officials have made this request repeatedly over the past 30 years and the state has repeatedly declined those requests. But the town is relentless, and this time they seem to have a sympathetic ear at MRPC so the request has gained traction as it makes its way over to DOT.


The purpose of this report is not to rally the people of Athol in opposition to the proposed ramp. That would be a wasted effort. The people will have no say in the matter. Route 2 is owned by the state and the decision whether to add a ramp will be made at the state level following the usual procedures and protocol.

The purpose of this report is to help the people of Athol understand whether or not the ramp is necessary and why town officials are so eager to have a ramp at that particular location. It also helps people understand the impending consequences of the ramp and presents options for neutralizing those consequences.







Route 2 Ramp at South Athol Road

Is a ramp on South Athol Road justifiably necessary for the Town of Athol?

The standard reasons to add a ramp include: population growth, public accessibility problems, traffic congestion relief, and future economic planning. So let's examine these issues.




Population Growth

In the data below we find that the population of Athol has been essentially unchanged for the past 90 years. It's a town of 11,000 +/- 5%. The town is not in the grips of a population explosion.

Growth is not a valid factor in justifying the need for this ramp.





Public Accessibility

Next, let's examine whether the proposed ramp is necessary to service the accessibility needs of the majority of residents.

As we can see in this street map, about 80% of Athol's population is corralled into neighborhoods along Route 2A, all of which are presently serviced far more efficiently by the existing ramps at exits 18, 17 and 16 than they would be by a ramp at South Athol Road. 


Public access is not a valid factor in justifying the need for this ramp.




                                                                        Source: Google Maps

Claiming that residents returning to town from the east would be inclined to drive 3-4 miles past exits 18 or 17 and then backtrack an additional 3 miles into town is a ridiculously absurd notion. By the time they reached South Athol Road they would already be home. Residents returning from the west would, to a lesser extent, be disinclined to pass exit 16 and take South Athol Road back into town. But eastbound traffic is not the alleged problem. All the activity is supposedly at Exit 18 and related to westbound traffic.

If there was a genuine access need for an additional ramp then the more logical choice would be Pleasant Street. Both the avoidance of the Pleasant Street option and the insistence upon the South Athol Road option are curiosities for sure, but not the subject matter of this particular investigative report.






Traffic Congestion

So now let's address the current state of traffic congestion in Athol.

There is no congestion. 


I'm not being facetious. 

Main Street (Route 2a) flows along nicely even at rush hour from one end of town to the other. The traffic lights at Pleasant Street and Exchange Street cause backups of about 10 vehicles which last about 45 seconds. At our existing highway ramps there are also no backups. At exit 18 during rush hour the line might be 6-8 cars in length while at exits 17 and 16 the line might be 3-4 cars.


People in most other parts of the state would be delighted to trade their congestion for ours.

Traffic congestion is not a valid factor in justifying the need for this ramp. 


The only congestion ever mentioned by town officials is future congestion at Exit 18 as the Market Basket Plaza expands and gains popularity. If that were to happen, people would simply use exits 19 or 17 to avoid any serious backups at Exit 18. 




Economic Planning

We have ruled out population growth, public accessibility and traffic congestion from the justification equation leaving only the future economic planning element and here's where things get real interesting.

Why are town officials fixated upon this unnecessary infrastructure project?

I have a theory:


The town is hinting that it would like to industrialize South Athol from Patridgeville Road to Route 2 and beyond as a means of expanding the tax base because residential property taxes have flat-lined but the town's debt continues to rise precipitously. Rather than being responsible, getting costs under control and living within their means, town officials prefer to create new revenue.

Let's tune in to the town manager where he explains the revenue benefits from Market Basket Plaza and includes a parenthetic comment about a shift from residential to CIP (commercial/industrial/professional) taxpayers.

And let's tune in again where the town manager hints at industrialization of South Athol.



The town manager makes it clear that the plan is to "economically develop" both the Bidwell Forest and South Athol Road and he links the ramp to the plan.

The Grand Plan

But the plan has a few glitches; least of which is the ramp.


1 - Over the years town officials have attempted to rezone South Athol from residential C to industrial but the voters rejected those changes. They are likely to reject any future zoning change as well.

2 - The cornerstone of the town's plans to industrial South Athol is the 100-acre Bidwell Forest which the town purchased in 2009. The problem with industrializing that parcel is that when the people voted to approve that purchase they did so after town officials told them it would be used as a municipal land bank for schools, ball fields, a new firehouse, open spaces, and in small print, “other uses”. Voters are unlikely to approve a bait & switch use. For more information, see this report: Bidwell Part I


3 - During the past 30 years there have been several attempts by local governments in our region to "create jobs" but in each case the result was complete failure. Asking voters to change zoning, change the use of the Bidwell Forest and take on debt for infrastructure spending in exchange for jobs may be a political plea which falls on deaf ears. For more information, see this report: Bidwell Part II

In the end, voter approval for the economic development of South Athol is uncertain. Using it as justification for the ramp is premature and frivolous.



Side Issue

As a part of my investigative work, I checked in with George Snow at Montachusett Regional Planning Commission to see how the ramp request was progressing. MRPC is the agency which conducts traffic and feasibility studies and then sends their recommendations along to the Massachusetts Department of Transportation for funding.

In my opinion Mr. Snow should be a watchdog for the taxpayer and an objective examiner. Instead he seems to be suspiciously in favor of this frivolous request and is justifying the spending of $25-million taxpayer dollars based upon some rather flimsy or exaggerated factors such as the absurd notion that 60 trailer trucks per day use Hapgood Street and create air pollution with their engine brakes. To his credit, he did go into great detail about how essential this ramp is (in his opinion) to future economic development and by so doing he confirmed both the true motives of town officials and his own complicity.


from the MRPC website



Conclusion

Summarizing matters, my investigation reveals that the ramp represents no immediate benefit to the people of Athol. It also reveals that future economic development along South Athol Road is not a certainty for a variety of reasons.

So if the people of Athol derive no benefit from the ramp at South Athol Road, who does? The answer to that question is found in: Bidwell Part III

In closing, the people of Athol are not able to control whether a ramp is added to South Athol Road. To the contrary, indications are that those involved in the process are operating full speed ahead despite the fact that the ramp is unnecessary. The ramp therefore appears set to become an eventual certainty.

But that doesn't mean the people have no recourse. They can neuter the effects of the ramp by rejecting zoning changes for South Athol Road and by rejecting any proposed industrial or economic development uses for the Bidwell Forest. If the people of Athol do not want the rural charm of South Athol permanently destroyed, they do have ways and means to help them resist these impending threats.

It is the opinion of this reporter that town officials should abandon their pursuit of the ramp and their plans to economically develop South Athol Road and the Bidwell Forest. Regarding the Bidwell Forest in particular, it should be held in reserve for future schools, ball fields, fire stations and other municipal uses as originally stated to the people of Athol.











Text of my email to George Snow of MRPC, dated July 17, 2018


Good Morning, Mr. Snow.

Thank you for being so generous with your time and forthcoming with results from the feasibility study for a ramp at Route 2 and South Athol Road.

Some of those results are inconsistent with my observations as a resident of the region so I present an overview for your consideration.

Pursuant to your statement that an average of 60 trailer trucks per day service Girardi, Whipps and Pexco via 2A (exit 18) to Hapgood Street I respond as follows:

1 - Hapgood Street is rarely used by trailer trucks due to the extremely steep grade. The preferred route is Daniel Shays (exit 16) to Partridgeville to South Athol Road as this route is flatter, has higher speed limits, less traffic, and gets you there in about the same amount of time.

2 - Girardi has a fleet of 10-wheel box trucks to deliver product to its local market. It does not ship product in trailer trucks but does receive by trailer truck infrequently.

3 - Whipps manufactures large water control systems which take days and weeks to complete so they ship perhaps one or two units per week and receive raw materials by trailer truck infrequently.

4 - Pexco ships and receives daily by trailer truck accounting for perhaps 10/day.

5 - 60 trailer trucks/day using Hapgood is simply far fetched. The traffic study methodology is either flawed or sabotaged.



Pursuant to your statement that a ramp would facilitate expansion of these companies, my response is that Whipps and Pexco have enjoyed growth and expansion for the past 40 years without the ramp. Furthermore, growth is a function of good management, good marketing and a good product and not the existence or lack of a highway ramp.


Pursuant to your statement that a ramp would reduce wear and tear on roads, I respond by stating that I fail to see the validity of that argument. What is the difference between wear and tear on 2 miles of Daniel Shays and Partridgeville vs. wear and tear on 2 miles of South Athol Road?


Pursuant to your statement that the ramp will reduce air pollution due to engine breaking and downshifting for the steep hills on Hapgood Street, I respond by stating that since trucks use Daniel Shays and not Hapgood, this argument is invalid.


Pursuant to your statement that the ramp would facilitate future economic growth and that it represents a sound element of planning for said growth I respond by agreeing in principle with that argument except as follows:

1 - South Athol Road is presently zoned Residential C which prohibits industrial uses. The town has rejected all previous attempts to rezone that part of town and may continue to do so, making economic development an uncertainty.

2 - Any attempt to persuade voters to rezone may fall on deaf ears. Over the past 20 years we have been told that various plans will bring jobs to town but in each instance the results were failure as follows:


a) North Quabbin Commons was originally presented as an industrial park bringing high paying full-time jobs with benefits. After 12 years, no industries came so it became a shopping center providing part time jobs with no benefits.

b) The Randall Pond Industrial Park has created essentially zero new jobs as its only tenants are either companies which were already doing business in town or which occupied the park after the town deleted the jobs creation requirement.

c) The Orange Industrial Airpark, which started out successful with 100% occupancy and full time employment for 600 residents has since shrunk to one major employer hiring an average of 150 with the rest of the buildings converted to warehouse space which employs essentially no one.

d) The crown jewel of the town's plan to industrialize South Athol is the Bidwell Forest, a 100-acre parcel of land which was presented to the people as a "land bank" for future use, the emphasis being schools, ball fields, fire station and in small print the vague reference to "or other uses". Any attempt to industrialize the Bidwell Forest will most likely result in citizen backlash against what is perceived to be a deceptive bait and switch tactic, putting town plans for that parcel in jeopardy.



Summary

In my estimate there appears to be no credible immediate need for the ramp. The only credible justification would be as an infrastructure investment for future economic development but given the history of incessant industrial failure in our region coupled with the likelihood that zoning changes are rejected and especially relative to the Bidwell Forest, one is hard pressed to make the case that the ramp would be little more than an expensive convenience for the marginal benefit of Girardi, Pexco and Whipps.

There is also this curious matter that the ramp would greatly benefit two sand and gravel companies with vast land holdings bordering the proposed ramp; a circumstance which overshadows the comparatively trivial justifications presented.

I appreciate your efforts to help our town plan for the future as I trust you appreciate my efforts to help our town avoid being exploited and victimized.


Best Regards,
David W. Runyan II